Dr. med. dent. M.Sc. Strößner + Team Appointment

Transparency · Costs

Why a dental invoice looks the way it does

Every private dental invoice shows three numbers: an item number, a factor and an amount. This page explains where they come from — and why a regulation dating from 1988 still determines today what your treatment costs.

In five sentences

  • The GOZ is a federal regulation. It has been in force since 1 January 1988 and was last revised with effect from 1 January 2012.
  • Every service has a fixed number of points. The point value of 5.62421 cents has stood unchanged in the regulation since 1988.
  • The uplift factor between 1.0 and 3.5 reflects how difficult and demanding a treatment was in the individual case.
  • Since 1988, consumer prices have risen to more than double. The point value has not.
  • This is why, for very demanding treatments, a higher factor is agreed in writing beforehand — voluntarily, comprehensibly and never in the case of pain or an emergency.

What the GOZ is — and what it is not

The Gebührenordnung für Zahnärzte is not a practice's price list but a federal statutory regulation. For every dental service it lays down how that service is described, how many points it counts for and within what range it may be billed. A practice cannot pick and choose these figures — it has to apply them.

The GOZ has been in force since 1 January 1988. Back then a litre of petrol cost about one Mark, and one point was worth 11 Pfennig. On 1 January 2012 the schedule of services was revised: new techniques were added, outdated ones dropped. The point value remained untouched — it was merely converted when the euro was introduced and has stood at 5.62421 cents ever since.

How a fee comes about

The invoice is a simple multiplication of three values:

Points × point value × uplift factor = fee

An example using a service that arises with almost every crown and every inlay — adhesive bonding, GOZ number 2197. It is rated at 130 points:

Sample calculation for adhesive bonding under GOZ 2197
Calculation stepResult
Points for the service130 points
Point value under the regulation5.62421 cents
Single rate (130 × 5.62421 cents)7,31 €
2.3-fold rate — standard case16,82 €
3.5-fold rate — maximum rate of the regulation25,59 €
4.86-fold rate — purchasing power of the 2.3-fold rate in 198835,53 €

The first two values are fixed. Only the factor can move — and it is precisely what the rest of this page is about.

The point value: a figure from 1988

The point value is the real sore point. It has never once been raised since the regulation came into force. By way of comparison: wages, rents, energy, materials and laboratory costs have risen considerably since then.

Prices and point value since 1988 From 1988 to 2025, consumer prices rose to around 211 percent. The point value of the GOZ remains unchanged at 100 percent. 100 %150 %200 % Consumer prices +111% GOZ point value: unchanged 1988200020122025
Since 1 January 1988, the point value of the GOZ has not been raised a single time. Over the same period, the cost of living has risen to more than double. Sources: § 5 Abs. 1 GOZ; Statistisches Bundesamt (Federal Statistical Office), consumer price index, long time series.

In concrete terms: what cost one euro in 1988 costs around 2.11 euros today. Put differently — the point value today still has about 47 percent of the purchasing power it had when it was introduced. The 2012 revision did not change this either: the Bundesgesundheitsministerium (Federal Ministry of Health) put the increase in fee volume at around six percent at the time — after 23 years without any adjustment at all.

Where the factors come from

The regulator knew that dental work cannot be forced into a single flat price. A root canal treatment on a straight front tooth is something different from the same treatment on a strongly curved molar. That is what the uplift factor is for.

The fee range of the GOZ From 1.0 to 2.3 without any special justification, from 2.3 to 3.5 with a written justification, above 3.5 only with a written agreement made beforehand. without justification with written justification only with an agreement 1.0single rate2.3Standard case3.5Maximum rate of the regulation above that § 2 GOZ
§ 5 GOZ marks out the range, § 10 Abs. 3 requires the justification above the 2.3-fold rate, and § 2 governs the agreement beyond it.

Legal framework: § 5 Abs. 1 und 2 GOZ (fee range and assessment), § 10 Abs. 3 GOZ (duty to give reasons), § 2 Abs. 1 bis 3 GOZ (deviating agreement, form, protection in emergencies).

Why agreements above 3.5 are made today

This is where the two lines meet. The factor is not a profit margin — it is the only lever the regulation provides at all. And because the point value has stood still since 1988, this lever now has to take on tasks it was never intended for: not only to reflect the effort involved, but also thirty-eight years of currency depreciation.

Purchasing power of the same uplift factor In 1988, the 2.3-fold rate had its full purchasing power. Today the same factor retains only around 47 percent of it. Even the maximum rate of 3.5 remains below that level. Only at around the 4.86-fold rate is the 1988 level reached again. 2.3-fold rate, 1988this is how it was meant100 %2.3-fold rate, todayonly 47% of that left47 %3.5-fold rate, todayeven the maximum rate stays below it72 %4.86-fold rate, todayback at the 1988 level100 % 1988 level = 100%
Read it like this: the factor on your invoice has not risen because the treatment has become more expensive — but because it also has to make up for the point value that has stood still. Calculation: consumer price index (Germany, 2020 = 100): 2025 = 121.9 divided by 1988 = 57.7 gives 2.11. The 1988 figure is chained via the cost-of-living price index for the former West Germany (1995 = 100). Source: Statistisches Bundesamt.

This is the heart of it: in today's purchasing power, the 2.3-fold rate of 1988 corresponds to roughly the 4.86-fold rate. Even the maximum rate of the regulation — 3.5 — is in real terms below what the 1.66-fold rate was worth in 1988. For treatments that work with a surgical microscope, navigated implant placement, digital planning, long treatment times or particularly high-quality materials, the range of the regulation is thus simply exhausted.

For precisely this situation, § 2 GOZ provides for the option of agreeing a higher factor. That is not a special arrangement, but the route the regulator itself intended.

What a high factor really means

At this point almost the same question always comes up: if you bill the 7-fold rate — do you then earn seven times as much as from a patient with statutory insurance? The answer surprises most people. No. Usually it is the other way round.

The reason lies in the two catalogues. Statutory health insurance bills according to the Bema, we bill privately according to the GOZ. Both describe the same work — but the GOZ base value is so low that even at the maximum rate of the regulation it often does not come close to the statutory amount. And that statutory amount is defined by law as what is sufficient, appropriate and economical — that is, precisely not a luxury benchmark, but a lower limit (§ 12 Abs. 1 SGB V).

Thorough examination: GOZ versus Bema For the same examination the GOZ provides for 5.62 euros at the single rate, 12.94 euros at the 2.3-fold rate and, even at the maximum rate of 3.5, only 19.68 euros. Statutory health insurance pays 23.40 euros. Only the 4.16-fold rate reaches this amount. GOZ, single rate5,62 €GOZ, 2.3-fold rate12,94 €GOZ, maximum rate 3.519,68 €Statutory health insurance (Bema 01)23,40 € Statutory level
The same examination, two catalogues. To reach the amount that statutory health insurance pays for it, the GOZ would have to be billed at the 4.16-fold rate. That is the balance factor.

For the check-up the gap is still small. For other services it is dramatic. The table below places 41 corresponding services from the two catalogues side by side — across prophylaxis, fillings, surgery, dentures and orthodontics.

41services compared
41 of 41are above the maximum rate of 3.5
4,29Median of all balance factors

Read the table like this: on the left is the GOZ service with the amount the regulation provides for in the standard case (2.3) and at the maximum (3.5). On the right is what the statutory health insurer pays for the corresponding service. The last column is the factor that would be needed to reach that amount. In not a single one of these 41 comparisons is the maximum rate of the regulation sufficient for that.

Comparison of GOZ amounts and Bema amounts for 41 corresponding services
GOZService GOZ2.3-fold GOZ3.5-fold Health insurerpays Factorneeded
4080Gum correction (gingivectomy)5,82 €8,86 €€33.80Bema AITb13.35
1010Checking the success of instruction (oral hygiene)12,94 €19,68 €€58.50Bema MHU10.40
1010Checking the success of instruction (oral hygiene)12,94 €19,68 €€54.60Bema UPTa + UPTb9.71
5150Adhesive bridge, first span94,43 €143,70 €€396.77Bema 93b9.66
4005Recording of a gingival or periodontal index10,35 €15,75 €€41.60Bema BEVa9.25
4005Recording of a gingival or periodontal index10,35 €15,75 €€41.60Bema BEVb9.25
4005Recording of a gingival or periodontal index10,35 €15,75 €€41.60Bema UPTg9.25
1010Checking the success of instruction (oral hygiene)12,94 €19,68 €€51.80Bema IP1 + IP29.21
3210Removal of interfering mucosal bands18,11 €27,56 €€62.40Bema 577.92
4040Elimination of gross premature contacts5,82 €8,86 €€18.95Bema 897.49
0040Treatment and cost plan, orthodontic32,34 €49,21 €€104.50Bema 57.43
2310Re-cementation of a crown18,76 €28,54 €€59.22Bema 100b7.26
4080Gum correction (gingivectomy)5,82 €8,86 €€18.20Bema AITa7.19
0010Thorough examination12,94 €19,68 €€39.20Bema FUZ16.97
0010Thorough examination12,94 €19,68 €€39.20Bema FUZ26.97
0010Thorough examination12,94 €19,68 €€39.20Bema FUZ36.97
1020Local fluoridation6,47 €9,84 €€19.60Bema FLA6.97
2000Sealing of caries-free fissures11,64 €17,72 €€22.40Bema IP54.43
4005Recording of a gingival or periodontal index10,35 €15,75 €€19.50Bema UPTd4.33
5280Complete relining of a denture34,93 €53,15 €€65.14Bema 100d4.29
5280Complete relining of a denture34,93 €53,15 €€65.14Bema 100di4.29
0010Thorough examination12,94 €19,68 €€23.40Bema 014.16
2090Three-surface filling38,42 €58,46 €€68.90Bema 13c4.12
5200Partial denture for a partially dentate jaw90,55 €137,79 €€162.27Bema 96c + 98f4.12
4020Local treatment of the oral mucosa5,82 €8,86 €€10.40Bema 1054.11
3190Cyst operation with osteotomy34,93 €53,15 €€62.40Bema 56c4.11
0100Block anaesthesia (anaesthetic injection)9,05 €13,78 €€15.60Bema 41a3.96
5080Connecting element of a bridge29,75 €45,27 €€50.93Bema 91e3.94
2070Two-surface filling31,30 €47,64 €€53.30Bema 13b3.92
2390Trepanation (opening) of a tooth8,41 €12,80 €€14.30Bema 313.91
5260Repair of a denture34,93 €53,15 €€59.22Bema 100b3.90
5260Repair of a denture34,93 €53,15 €€59.22Bema 100bi3.90
7000Occlusal splint without an adjusted surface34,93 €53,15 €€58.50Bema K23.85
3030Tooth removal by osteotomy45,27 €68,90 €€75.40Bema 47a3.83
3120Apicoectomy, posterior tooth75,03 €114,17 €€124.80Bema 54b3.83
6160Fitting of an anchorage (orthodontics)47,86 €72,83 €€79.20Bema 1303.81
6010Jaw model analysis23,28 €35,43 €€38.50Bema 1173.80
5290Complete relining with border moulding58,21 €88,58 €€95.94Bema 100e3.79
5290Complete relining with border moulding58,21 €88,58 €€95.94Bema 100ei3.79
2360Removal of the tooth nerve (root canal treatment)14,23 €21,65 €€23.40Bema 283.78
2190Cast post and core58,21 €88,58 €€94.75Bema 18b3.74

All 41 comparisons — the table can be scrolled. Sorted by the required factor, descending.

How this table comes about

  • In each case, corresponding services from the two catalogues are compared. Where several Bema numbers cover one GOZ service, they have been combined (for example “96c + 98f”).
  • The GOZ amounts are calculated from the official point count and the point value of 5.62421 cents, not estimated.
  • The Bema amounts come from our practice software and are based on the regional point values that apply to us (as of August 2026). In other KZV regions (regional associations of statutory health insurance dentists) they differ slightly.
  • The balance factor is neither a basis for billing nor a justification for an uplift factor. How high the factor on your invoice turns out to be depends solely on § 5 GOZ — on the difficulty, the time required and the circumstances of your treatment. The table merely puts into perspective the level at which the base values of the GOZ stand today.
  • The comparison says nothing about profit. Materials, laboratory, staff, equipment, premises and taxes come off every amount — in both catalogues alike.

So if your cost estimate ever shows a factor of 5, 7 or more, that does not mean we earn five or seven times as much. As a rule it means: this service is rated so low in the GOZ of 1988 that only this factor reflects the effort the treatment actually involves.

How such an agreement works

What this means for privately insured patients

Your tariff decides how much you get back — not the practice. The spread is wide: some tariffs reimburse up to the 3.5-fold rate and beyond, others cap at 2.3. Beihilfe offices as a rule reimburse up to 2.3, and up to 3.5 in justified cases.

Our suggestion: ask us for a cost estimate and submit it to your insurer before the treatment. Then you know in advance what your tariff covers — and we can adjust the planning while nothing has been decided yet.

What this means for patients with statutory health insurance

Your statutory health insurer pays for standard care. We bill that directly with them, under a different catalogue — the BEMA. You only come into contact with the GOZ where you decide on something that goes beyond standard care:

In all of these cases you receive a treatment and cost plan or a cost estimate beforehand. Nothing is started before you know what it costs.

Invoice, instalments and reimbursement

Our invoices are handled by BFS health finance, a billing company specialising in the healthcare professions. For you, this changes nothing about the invoice itself — it follows the same fee schedule, with the same item numbers and factors. What changes is what you can do with it afterwards.

Why the reimbursement service matters particularly to us: with precisely the items this page is about — justified factors above 2.3, agreements under § 2 GOZ — insurers occasionally make reductions using standard text blocks, without examining the individual case. You should not have to stand up to that on your own. The point is that your insurer should in the end pay what it has contractually undertaken to pay.

Billing through BFS requires your written consent — without that consent no data is passed on. You receive it before the treatment together with the other documents. Payment in instalments and the reimbursement service are offered by BFS health finance; the terms apply between you and BFS.

How we handle this

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do I receive an invoice under the GOZ at all if I have statutory health insurance?

Your statutory health insurer covers what is known as standard care; we bill that directly with them. Everything that goes beyond it — a ceramic filling instead of amalgam, a professional dental cleaning or an implant, for example — is not a statutory benefit. We bill that part with you according to the GOZ. You receive the amount in writing beforehand, before anything is done.

What is the point value, and why does it matter so much?

Every service in the GOZ has a fixed number of points. The point value states what one point is worth in euros: 5.62421 cents. This figure has stood unchanged in the regulation since 1 January 1988. It is the price set by the regulator — not by the practice.

What does the 2.3-fold rate mean?

The GOZ sets a range from the 1.0-fold to the 3.5-fold rate. The 2.3-fold rate is regarded as the value for a treatment of average difficulty and average effort. If it is exceeded, this must be justified on the invoice in writing, understandably and comprehensibly — with reference to your case, not with a standard text block.

Why are factors above 3.5 agreed today?

Because the point value has not been adjusted since 1988, while prices have risen to more than double since then. In real terms, today's 3.5-fold rate has less purchasing power than the 1.66-fold rate of 1988. For very demanding treatments — microscope, navigation, long treatment times, high-quality materials — the range of the regulation is therefore no longer sufficient. For such cases, § 2 GOZ provides for a written agreement.

Is such an agreement mandatory?

No. It is voluntary and has to be made in writing before the treatment. You can decline it; we then discuss a solution within the range of the regulation or a different treatment option. Under § 2 Abs. 3 GOZ, treatment for pain or in an emergency may never be made dependent on such an agreement — you are treated first in any case.

Do you earn more from privately insured patients than from patients with statutory insurance?

With a factor of 7 or 8 many people assume so — but usually it is not the case. We compared 41 corresponding services from the GOZ and the Bema. In not a single one does the GOZ maximum rate of 3.5 reach the amount that the statutory health insurer pays for the same work; typically the 4.29-fold rate would be needed. A high factor therefore usually compensates for the very low base value of the 1988 GOZ instead of representing a surcharge. You will find the full table further up this page.

Can I pay the invoice in instalments?

Yes. Our invoices are handled by BFS health finance; there you can arrange to pay in instalments — from 25 euros a month and over a term of up to 72 months. You can do this online or in the BFS app; the access details are on your invoice. BFS will tell you the terms before you agree to them.

What can I do if my insurer reduces the payment?

Ask for the rejection in writing — that is the precondition for everything else. BFS health finance then offers you a free reimbursement service: you submit the notice of rejection, BFS examines it and draws up a professional counter-statement that you pass on to your insurer. And do speak to us — where an item can be justified comprehensibly, we are happy to explain it again in writing.

Will my insurer reimburse this?

That depends on your tariff, not on us. Many private tariffs reimburse up to the 3.5-fold rate, some beyond that, some only up to the 2.3-fold rate. Beihilfe offices as a rule reimburse up to the 2.3-fold rate, and up to 3.5 in justified cases. This is why you receive a cost estimate from us in advance that you can submit to your insurer — so you know before the treatment what to expect.

May a practice set its own point value?

No. § 2 Abs. 1 GOZ expressly prohibits agreeing on different point counts or point values. Only the uplift factor can be agreed. In every case, the basis of the calculation remains the regulation.

Sources

Figures as of August 2026. The consumer price index refers to the base 2020 = 100 (1988: 57.7, chained via the series for the former West Germany; 2025: 121.9). This page explains how the fee schedule works and does not replace legal or tax advice. Whether your insurer reimburses, and how much, depends solely on your contract.

Book an appointment Ask a question about your invoice

Listing

Leading Implant Centers

Leading Implant Centers is an international directory of practices working in implantology. Admission follows a review of training, further education and implantology experience by the publisher's medical advisory board. Dr. Strößner has been listed there as an implantologist since 2022. This listing is not a state certification, nor a quality seal awarded by a professional association.

More from the publisher

Membership

DGI – German Society for Implantology

With more than 10,000 members, the DGI (German Society of Implantology) is the largest scientific professional association for implantology in Europe. As a member, Dr. Strößner commits to following the DGI guidelines, pursuing continuous, structured continuing education, and actively exchanging views with colleagues in professional discourse. Membership reflects the aspiration to practise implantology in line with the current state of scientific knowledge. Dr. Strößner has also completed the DGI/APW Curriculum in Implantology and the Master of Science in Oral Implantology and Periodontology (Steinbeis-Hochschule, in cooperation with the DGI).

More from the publisher

Partner Programme – Straumann Group

Immediacy Center of Excellence

The “Immediacy Center of Excellence” is a programme run by the Straumann Group, a global manufacturer of dental implant systems. Practices can take part if they can demonstrate documented case numbers in immediate implant placement (“Immediacy”), regular further training, and a digital planning and manufacturing workflow using the manufacturer's products. Our practice has been a partner practice in this programme since January 2025. Participation is a manufacturer partnership and not an independent certification.

More from the publisher

Saturday

What “by arrangement” means

On Saturdays we treat by prior arrangement — specifically for matters that need a long, uninterrupted block of time: implant placements, larger surgical procedures, extensive dental prosthetics, treatment under sedation or general anaesthesia, and appointments for patients who travel a longer distance and would like to have everything done in one day.

For short matters — a polish, a check-up, having a filling looked at — we will find an appointment together during the week. That is usually quicker for you as well.

Whether your case fits, we can clarify on the phone in two minutes.

Call

Everything in one placeAppointments, questions, etc.